Deinococcaceae Details: NCBI 183710, gram-negative or unknown [family]

| Deinococcaceae| Deinococcaceae Brooks and Murray 1981 emend. Rainey et al. 1997

1. Resistance to Environmental Stress: Bacteria in the Deinococcaceae family, particularly Deinococcus species, are known for their extreme resistance to environmental stresses, including ionizing radiation, ultraviolet (UV) radiation, and desiccation. This resilience is attributed to their efficient DNA repair mechanisms.

2. Non-pathogenic: Deinococcaceae bacteria are not considered pathogens and are not associated with causing diseases in humans. They are more commonly found in environmental niches, including soil and water.

3. Biotechnological Applications: The unique characteristics of Deinococcus bacteria, such as their ability to withstand high levels of radiation, have led to interest in their biotechnological applications. They have been studied for their potential use in bioremediation and other industrial processes.

4. Research Focus: While Deinococcaceae is not known to be pathogenic to humans, the family has been extensively studied for its fundamental biology, radiation resistance mechanisms, and potential applications in various fields.

5. Environmental Impact: Understanding the role of Deinococcaceae in natural environments contributes to our knowledge of microbial diversity and resilience in extreme conditions. These bacteria may play ecological roles in nutrient cycling and environmental processes.

Visuals of Interactions with other bacteria of the same rank

A lot more information is available when you are logged in and raise the display level

Other Sources for more information:

• Immune Epitope Database
• The NCBI taxonomy database
• UniProt
• Immune Epitope Taxonomy Database (IEDB)
• AI Engines For more Details: Perplexity  Kagi Labs  You 

More Information

Statistics

NCBI

Data Punk

End Products Produced

Lab Reporting

Different labs use different software to read the sample. See this post for more details.
One lab may say you have none, another may say you have a lot! - This may be solely due to the software they are using to estimate.
We deem lab specific values using values from the KM method for each specific lab to be the most reliable.

Desired Levels Suggestions for Deinococcaceae

• Frequency - how often do samples show this bacteria
• UD - An alternative statistical algorithm (which factors in the frequency)
• Kaltoft-Moldrup Heuristic Using uploaded data
• Lab Low and High are calculated using the formula that most labs use: Mean - 2 Standard Deviation to Mean + 2 Standard Deviation

These are values that are computed from lab specific samples (Patent Pending)

Lab	Frequency	UD-Low	UD-High	KM Low	KM High	Lab Low	Lab High	Mean	Median	Standard Deviation	Box Plot Low	Box Plot High	KM Percentile Low	KM Percentile High
Other Labs	1.02			8	8217	0	3753	414.9	20	1703	0	180	0 %ile	100 %ile
biomesight	44.09	0	20	10	410	0	434	81.5	30	179.7	10	130	0 %ile	97.2 %ile
thorne	100			12	166	0	147	68.8	56	40	30	114	0 %ile	100 %ile
thryve	10.83	0		1	326	0	123	32.8	19	46.1	9	43	0 %ile	100 %ile
ubiome	0.76			21	180	0	182	65.2	40	59.8	21	180	12.5 %ile	75 %ile

External Reference Ranges for Deinococcaceae

Deinococcaceae (NCBI 183710) per million

Source of Ranges	Low Boundary	High Boundary	Low Boundary %age	High Boundary %age
PrecisionBiome	1.5193158105830662E-05	6.747362203896046E-05	0	0
Thorne (20/80%ile)	36.55	85.79	0.0037	0.0086

Statistic by Lab Source for Deinococcaceae

These desired values are reported from the lab reports

Lab	Frequency Seen	Average	Standard Deviation	Sample Count	Lab Samples
BiomeSight	49.159 %	0.012 %	0.07 %	2310.0	4699
BiomeSightRdp	38.71 %	0.002 %	0.002 %	12.0	31
bugspeak	100 %	0.016 %	%	1.0	1
CerbaLab	66.667 %	0.001 %	0.001 %	2.0	3
custom	1.299 %	0.002 %	%	1.0	77
es-xenogene	18.75 %	0.013 %	0.014 %	6.0	32
Medivere	50 %	0.003 %	0.004 %	4.0	8
SequentiaBiotech	2.857 %	0.822 %	%	1.0	35
Thorne	93.537 %	0.003 %	0.002 %	275.0	294
Thryve	11.147 %	0.003 %	0.004 %	172.0	1543
uBiome	0.748 %	0.007 %	0.006 %	6.0	802

To see medical conditions associated you may be logged in

And display level must be raised above public.

I would like to know what can change the quality that I have

• If I want to know that a substance also changes, then I just click on it
• If I want to know which study this information comes from, then I just clink in increases or decreases

Data Contradictions — Limits of Certainity

To get the list of studies, you must be logged in and raise your display level.

🧙? Search Hints:

General Substance	Specific Substance	Effect
Diet Style	High-protein diet {Atkins low-carbohydrate diet}	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases👪, Click for details.
Food (excluding seasonings)	high red meat	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases👪, Click for details.
Food (excluding seasonings)	Honey {Honey }	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases👪, Click for details.
Prescription - Other	Enterococcus faecalis {Streptococcus faecalis}	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases👪, Click for details.
Probiotics	bacillus subtilis {B.Subtilis }	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Decreases👪, Click for details.
Probiotics	bacillus,lactobacillus,streptococcus,saccharomyces probiotic	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases👪, Click for details.
Sugar and similar	D-glucose {Glucose}	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases👪, Click for details.