Rodentibacter pneumotropicus Details: NCBI 758, gram-negative or unknown [species]

| ATCC 35149| CCUG 12398| CIP 66.16| DSM 21403| JCM 14074| LMG 4224| LMG:4224| NCTC 8141| Pasteurella pneumotropica| Pasteurella pneumotropica Jawetz 1950 (Approved Lists 1980)| Pasteurellaceae bacterium Ac63| Rodentibacter pneumotropicus| Rodentibacter pneumotropicus (Jawetz 1950) Adhikary et al. 2017

1. Environmental Role: Flavobacterium aquatile and other members of the genus Flavobacterium are known for their diverse metabolic capabilities and their ability to degrade complex organic compounds in aquatic environments. They contribute to nutrient cycling, organic matter decomposition, and the maintenance of ecosystem balance in freshwater and marine habitats.

2. Biotechnological Applications: Some Flavobacterium species, including Flavobacterium aquatile, have been studied for their potential biotechnological applications, particularly in the fields of wastewater treatment, bioremediation, and aquaculture. They may have roles in the degradation of pollutants and the production of enzymes or bioactive compounds with industrial or environmental significance.

3. Rare Human Infections: While Flavobacterium aquatile is not considered a common human pathogen, there have been rare reports of infections in humans, typically associated with immunocompromised individuals or those with underlying medical conditions. In such cases, Flavobacterium aquatile infections may present as opportunistic infections, such as wound infections, bacteremia, or urinary tract infections.

4. Prevention: Preventive measures to minimize the risk of infections with Flavobacterium aquatile or other environmental bacteria include maintaining good hygiene practices, avoiding exposure to contaminated water sources, and implementing proper wound care and infection control measures, particularly in healthcare settings.

Visuals of Interactions with other bacteria of the same rank

A lot more information is available when you are logged in and raise the display level

Other Sources for more information:

• Immune Epitope Database
• The NCBI taxonomy database
• UniProt
• Immune Epitope Taxonomy Database (IEDB)
• AI Engines For more Details: Perplexity  Kagi Labs  You 

More Information

Statistics

NCBI

Data Punk

End Products Produced

Lab Reporting

Different labs use different software to read the sample. See this post for more details.
One lab may say you have none, another may say you have a lot! - This may be solely due to the software they are using to estimate.
We deem lab specific values using values from the KM method for each specific lab to be the most reliable.

Desired Levels Suggestions for Rodentibacter pneumotropicus

• Frequency - how often do samples show this bacteria
• UD - An alternative statistical algorithm (which factors in the frequency)
• Kaltoft-Moldrup Heuristic Using uploaded data
• Lab Low and High are calculated using the formula that most labs use: Mean - 2 Standard Deviation to Mean + 2 Standard Deviation

These are values that are computed from lab specific samples (Patent Pending)

Lab	Frequency	UD-Low	UD-High	KM Low	KM High	Lab Low	Lab High	Mean	Median	Standard Deviation	Box Plot Low	Box Plot High	KM Percentile Low	KM Percentile High
Other Labs	0.04			0	2			2	2		2	2	0 %ile	99 %ile
biomesight	2.98	0	0	10	429	0	155	34.6	20	61.4	0	40	0 %ile	100 %ile
thorne	17.24			1	18	0	19	4.8	2	7.4	1	18	14.3 %ile	71.4 %ile
ubiome	2.41			22	3525	0	2286	473.3	52	924.6	22	3525	0 %ile	100 %ile

External Reference Ranges for Rodentibacter pneumotropicus

Rodentibacter pneumotropicus (NCBI 758) per million

Source of Ranges	Low Boundary	High Boundary	Low Boundary %age	High Boundary %age

Statistic by Lab Source for Rodentibacter pneumotropicus

These desired values are reported from the lab reports

Lab	Frequency Seen	Average	Standard Deviation	Sample Count	Lab Samples
BiomeSight	3.928 %	0.003 %	0.005 %	178.0	4531
custom	1.37 %	0 %	%	1.0	73
Thorne	17.921 %	0 %	0 %	50.0	279
uBiome	2.375 %	0.047 %	0.092 %	19.0	800

To see medical conditions associated you may be logged in

And display level must be raised above public.

I would like to know what can change the quality that I have

• If I want to know that a substance also changes, then I just click on it
• If I want to know which study this information comes from, then I just clink in increases or decreases

Data Contradictions — Limits of Certainity

To get the list of studies, you must be logged in and raise your display level.

🧙? Search Hints:

General Substance	Specific Substance	Effect
Drug or "Non-drug"	Methylene blue	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases👶, Click for details.