Chroococcales Details: NCBI 1118, gram-negative or unknown [order]

| Chroococcales| Chroococcales Schaffner 1922| Chroococcales Wettstein1924 emend. Rippka et al. 1979

1. Harmful algal blooms (HABs): Some species of Chroococcales cyanobacteria can form harmful algal blooms (HABs) in freshwater and marine environments, particularly in nutrient-rich waters with warm temperatures and calm conditions. These blooms can produce toxins known as cyanotoxins, including microcystins, cylindrospermopsin, and anatoxins, which can pose risks to human and animal health.

2. Cyanotoxin production: Cyanotoxins produced by Chroococcales cyanobacteria can have various health effects on humans and animals, depending on the toxin type, concentration, and exposure route. These effects may include gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea), skin irritation, respiratory problems (coughing, wheezing), liver damage, neurotoxic effects (seizures, paralysis), and allergic reactions. Chronic exposure to cyanotoxins has been associated with long-term health effects such as liver cancer and neurodegenerative diseases.

3. Drinking water contamination: Chroococcales cyanobacterial blooms in surface waters can contaminate drinking water sources, posing risks to public health. Cyanotoxins can persist in water supplies even after treatment, and exposure to contaminated drinking water can cause acute and chronic health effects in humans. Monitoring and management of cyanobacterial blooms in drinking water sources are essential for ensuring safe drinking water quality.

4. Livestock and wildlife toxicity: Cyanotoxins produced by Chroococcales cyanobacteria can also affect animals, including livestock, pets, fish, and wildlife, through ingestion of contaminated water or algae. Livestock poisoning from cyanobacterial toxins, known as cyanotoxicosis, can lead to illness or death in animals. Wildlife mortality events linked to cyanobacterial blooms have been reported in various ecosystems, affecting aquatic and terrestrial species.

Visuals of Interactions with other bacteria of the same rank

A lot more information is available when you are logged in and raise the display level

Other Sources for more information:

• Immune Epitope Database
• The NCBI taxonomy database
• UniProt
• Immune Epitope Taxonomy Database (IEDB)
• AI Engines For more Details: Perplexity  Kagi Labs  You 

More Information

Statistics

NCBI

Data Punk

End Products Produced

Lab Reporting

Different labs use different software to read the sample. See this post for more details.
One lab may say you have none, another may say you have a lot! - This may be solely due to the software they are using to estimate.
We deem lab specific values using values from the KM method for each specific lab to be the most reliable.

Desired Levels Suggestions for Chroococcales

• Frequency - how often do samples show this bacteria
• UD - An alternative statistical algorithm (which factors in the frequency)
• Kaltoft-Moldrup Heuristic Using uploaded data
• Lab Low and High are calculated using the formula that most labs use: Mean - 2 Standard Deviation to Mean + 2 Standard Deviation

These are values that are computed from lab specific samples (Patent Pending)

Lab	Frequency	UD-Low	UD-High	KM Low	KM High	Lab Low	Lab High	Mean	Median	Standard Deviation	Box Plot Low	Box Plot High	KM Percentile Low	KM Percentile High
Other Labs	0.66			1	1873	0	1103	172.6	21	474.5	1	1873	5.9 %ile	88.2 %ile
biomesight	62.66	0	60	10	1350	0	7476	387.6	60	3616.6	0	260	3.7 %ile	97.2 %ile
thorne	100			3	52	0	42	15.2	9	13.7	1	33	0 %ile	100 %ile
thryve	4.51	0	0	2	140	0	68	25	18	21.9	10	36	0 %ile	100 %ile
ubiome	0.13			0	34			34	34		34	34	0 %ile	99 %ile

External Reference Ranges for Chroococcales

Chroococcales (NCBI 1118) per million

Source of Ranges	Low Boundary	High Boundary	Low Boundary %age	High Boundary %age
PrecisionBiome	1.650888953008689E-05	8.393017924390733E-05	0	0
Thorne (20/80%ile)	3.75	8.84	0.0004	0.0009

Statistic by Lab Source for Chroococcales

These desired values are reported from the lab reports

Lab	Frequency Seen	Average	Standard Deviation	Sample Count	Lab Samples
BiomeSight	69.279 %	0.045 %	0.394 %	3227.0	4658
bugspeak	100 %	0.005 %	%	1.0	1
CerbaLab	66.667 %	0.001 %	0 %	2.0	3
custom	3.947 %	0.001 %	0 %	3.0	76
es-xenogene	9.375 %	0.011 %	0.012 %	3.0	32
Medivere	62.5 %	0.006 %	0.004 %	5.0	8
Thorne	90.034 %	0.001 %	0.001 %	262.0	291
Thryve	4.666 %	0.003 %	0.002 %	72.0	1543
uBiome	0.125 %	0.003 %	%	1.0	802
vitract	100 %	0.094 %	0.132 %	2.0	2

To see medical conditions associated you may be logged in

And display level must be raised above public.

I would like to know what can change the quality that I have

• If I want to know that a substance also changes, then I just click on it
• If I want to know which study this information comes from, then I just clink in increases or decreases

Data Contradictions — Limits of Certainity

To get the list of studies, you must be logged in and raise your display level.

🧙? Search Hints:

General Substance	Specific Substance	Effect
Diet Style	dietary fiber	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases👶, Click for details.
Diet Style	Fiber, total dietary	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases👶, Click for details.
Diet Style	High-fibre diet {Whole food diet}	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases👶, Click for details.
Diet Style	Slow digestible carbohydrates. {Low Glycemic}	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases👶, Click for details.
Food (excluding seasonings)	blueberry	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases👶, Click for details.
Food (excluding seasonings)	fruit	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases👶, Click for details.
Food (excluding seasonings)	fruit/legume fibre	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases👶, Click for details.