Rhodanobacteraceae Details: NCBI 1775411, gram-negative or unknown [family]

| Rhodanobacteraceae| Rhodanobacteraceae Naushad et al. 2015

1. Environmental Bacteria: Many bacteria in the Rhodanobacteraceae family are environmental bacteria, and they are often associated with soil and water ecosystems. They play roles in nutrient cycling and other ecological processes in these environments.

2. Limited Human Health Focus: The research focus on Rhodanobacteraceae has been more oriented towards environmental and ecological aspects rather than direct implications for human health. These bacteria are not typically associated with human infections or diseases based on current knowledge.

3. Potential Biotechnological Applications: Some bacteria in the Rhodanobacteraceae family have been studied for their metabolic capabilities and potential applications in bioremediation and other biotechnological processes.

Visuals of Interactions with other bacteria of the same rank

A lot more information is available when you are logged in and raise the display level

Other Sources for more information:

• Immune Epitope Database
• The NCBI taxonomy database
• UniProt
• Immune Epitope Taxonomy Database (IEDB)
• AI Engines For more Details: Perplexity  Kagi Labs  You 

More Information

Statistics

NCBI

Data Punk

End Products Produced

Lab Reporting

Different labs use different software to read the sample. See this post for more details.
One lab may say you have none, another may say you have a lot! - This may be solely due to the software they are using to estimate.
We deem lab specific values using values from the KM method for each specific lab to be the most reliable.

Desired Levels Suggestions for Rhodanobacteraceae

• Frequency - how often do samples show this bacteria
• UD - An alternative statistical algorithm (which factors in the frequency)
• Kaltoft-Moldrup Heuristic Using uploaded data
• Lab Low and High are calculated using the formula that most labs use: Mean - 2 Standard Deviation to Mean + 2 Standard Deviation

These are values that are computed from lab specific samples (Patent Pending)

Lab	Frequency	UD-Low	UD-High	KM Low	KM High	Lab Low	Lab High	Mean	Median	Standard Deviation	Box Plot Low	Box Plot High	KM Percentile Low	KM Percentile High
Other Labs	0.62			3	200	0	177	55.6	26	61.9	3	200	6.3 %ile	87.5 %ile
biomesight	63.66	0	120	10	4850	0	4353	689.1	120	1869.2	0	900	3.7 %ile	97.4 %ile
thorne	100			7	105	0	89	33.9	23	28.3	3	69	0 %ile	100 %ile
thryve	18.23	0	9	1	850	0	194	41	22	77.9	10	54	0 %ile	100 %ile

External Reference Ranges for Rhodanobacteraceae

Rhodanobacteraceae (NCBI 1775411) per million

Source of Ranges	Low Boundary	High Boundary	Low Boundary %age	High Boundary %age
PrecisionBiome	1.5455754692084156E-05	7.819251186447218E-05	0	0
Thorne (20/80%ile)	12.25	31.24	0.0012	0.0031

Statistic by Lab Source for Rhodanobacteraceae

These desired values are reported from the lab reports

Lab	Frequency Seen	Average	Standard Deviation	Sample Count	Lab Samples
BiomeSight	67.954 %	0.062 %	0.19 %	3168.0	4662
BiomeSightRdp	16.129 %	0.011 %	0.007 %	5.0	31
bugspeak	100 %	0.005 %	%	1.0	1
CerbaLab	66.667 %	0.001 %	0 %	2.0	3
custom	1.316 %	0 %	%	1.0	76
es-xenogene	15.625 %	0.011 %	0.007 %	5.0	32
Medivere	37.5 %	0.002 %	0.001 %	3.0	8
Thorne	90.378 %	0.001 %	0.002 %	263.0	291
Thryve	17.693 %	0.005 %	0.021 %	273.0	1543

To see medical conditions associated you may be logged in

And display level must be raised above public.

I would like to know what can change the quality that I have

• If I want to know that a substance also changes, then I just click on it
• If I want to know which study this information comes from, then I just clink in increases or decreases

Data Contradictions — Limits of Certainity

To get the list of studies, you must be logged in and raise your display level.

🧙? Search Hints:

General Substance	Specific Substance	Effect
Diet Style	dietary fiber	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Diet Style	Fiber, total dietary	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Diet Style	High-fibre diet {Whole food diet}	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Diet Style	Slow digestible carbohydrates. {Low Glycemic}	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Food (excluding seasonings)	blueberry	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Food (excluding seasonings)	fruit	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Food (excluding seasonings)	fruit/legume fibre	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Food (excluding seasonings)	Propolis {Bee glue}	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Prebiotics and similar	Human milk oligosaccharides (prebiotic, Holigos, Stachyose)	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Decreases👪, Click for details.
Prebiotics and similar	oligosaccharides {oligosaccharides}	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Decreases👪, Click for details.

Foods Containing the Rhodanobacteraceae bacteria

Data comes from FoodMicrobionet. For the meaning of weight, see that site. The bacteria does not need to be alive to have an effect.

Malaysian fermented fish sauce Weight: 0.1595 Passito wine Weight: 0.1591 Cider - Dry Weight: 0.08193 Surstromming - Fermented Herring (Sweden) Weight: 0.01231 Ham fermented for 4 years Weight: 0.01132 Robiola di Roccaverano Cheese (Italy) Weight: 0.01017 Swiss-Dutch-type cheese Weight: 0.001423