| ATCC 29627| ATCC 33609 [[Rhodococcus chubuensis Tsukamura 1983]]| ATCC 33610 [[Rhodococcus obuensis Tsukamura 1983]]| CCUG 47138| CIP 100849| DSM 43896| DSM 44019 [[Rhodococcus chubuensis Tsukamura 1983]]| Gordona sputi| Gordonia sputi| Gordonia sputi (Tsukamura 1978) Stackebrandt et al. 1989 emend. Riegel et al. 1994| Gordonia sputi (Tsukamura 1978) Stackebrandt et al. 1989 emend. Tsukamura 1991| IFO 16049| JCM 3228| JCM 6047 [[Rhodococcus chubuensis Tsukamura 1983]]| NBRC 100414| NBRC 16049| Rhodococcus chubuensis| Rhodococcus chubuensis Tsukamura 1983| Rhodococcus obuensis| Rhodococcus obuensis Tsukamura 1983| Rhodococcus sputi| Rhodococcus sputi (ex Tsukamura 1978) Tsukamura and Yano 1985| Rhodococcus sputi Tsukamura 1978 (Approved Lists 1980)| strain E6324 [[Rhodococcus chubuensis Tsukamura 1983]]| strain E8179 [[Rhodococcus obuensis Tsukamura 1983]]
Rare Infections: Gordonia sputi and other Gordonia species have been implicated in rare cases of human infections. These infections are typically opportunistic and may occur in immunocompromised individuals or those with underlying medical conditions. Infections caused by Gordonia sputi may manifest as localized infections, abscesses, or systemic infections.
Clinical Presentation: The clinical presentation of infections caused by Gordonia sputi may vary depending on the site of infection and the host's immune status. Common presentations include skin and soft tissue infections, pulmonary infections, bloodstream infections, or infections of indwelling medical devices.
Antibiotic Susceptibility: Gordonia species, including Gordonia sputi, are often resistant to multiple antibiotics, including beta-lactams, macrolides, and fluoroquinolones. Treatment of infections caused by Gordonia sputi may require multidrug regimens and prolonged courses of antibiotics, guided by antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
Laboratory Identification: Gordonia species may be misidentified or overlooked in clinical microbiology laboratories due to their similarity to other bacteria, particularly mycobacteria. Accurate identification of Gordonia sputi is important for appropriate diagnosis and management of infections.
A lot more information is available when you are logged in and raise the display level
Other Sources for more information:
![]() |
NCBI | Data Punk | End Products Produced |
Different labs use different software to read the sample. See this post for more details.
One lab may say you have none, another may say you have a lot! - This may be solely due to the software they are using to estimate.
We deem lab specific values using values from the KM method for each specific lab to be the most reliable.
Lab | Frequency | UD-Low | UD-High | KM Low | KM High | Lab Low | Lab High | Mean | Median | Standard Deviation | Box Plot Low | Box Plot High | KM Percentile Low | KM Percentile High |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Other Labs | 0.04 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 0 %ile | 100 %ile | |||||
ubiome | 0.13 | 0 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 0 %ile | 99 %ile |
Source of Ranges | Low Boundary | High Boundary | Low Boundary %age | High Boundary %age |
---|
Lab | Frequency Seen | Average | Standard Deviation | Sample Count | Lab Samples |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
uBiome | 0.125 % | 0.004 % | % | 1.0 | 802 |
|
And display level must be raised above public.