Opportunistic Infections: Exophiala species can cause opportunistic infections, especially in immunocompromised individuals. These infections can manifest in various forms, including bloodstream infections (fungemia), pulmonary infections, sinusitis, otitis externa (outer ear infection), skin and soft tissue infections, and invasive infections in other organs.
Pulmonary Infections: Exophiala species have been implicated in pulmonary infections, including pneumonia, particularly in immunocompromised individuals or those with underlying lung diseases such as cystic fibrosis or bronchiectasis.
Sinusitis and Otitis Externa: Exophiala species have been associated with sinusitis (inflammation of the sinuses) and otitis externa (inflammation of the outer ear canal), particularly in individuals with chronic respiratory conditions or those who have undergone sinus or ear surgeries.
Skin and Soft Tissue Infections: Exophiala species can cause skin and soft tissue infections, including cutaneous and subcutaneous infections, abscesses, and mycetomas (fungal masses in tissues), especially in individuals with compromised skin barriers or those with chronic wounds.
Eye Infections: Exophiala species have been implicated in eye infections, including keratitis (inflammation of the cornea) and endophthalmitis (inflammation of the interior of the eye), particularly in individuals who wear contact lenses or have undergone eye surgeries.
Systemic Infections: In severe cases, Exophiala species can cause systemic infections involving multiple organs, particularly in severely immunocompromised individuals or those with underlying medical conditions such as cancer, HIV/AIDS, or organ transplantation.
A lot more information is available when you are logged in and raise the display level
Other Sources for more information:
![]() |
NCBI | Data Punk | End Products Produced |
Different labs use different software to read the sample. See this post for more details.
One lab may say you have none, another may say you have a lot! - This may be solely due to the software they are using to estimate.
We deem lab specific values using values from the KM method for each specific lab to be the most reliable.
Lab | Frequency | UD-Low | UD-High | KM Low | KM High | Lab Low | Lab High | Mean | Median | Standard Deviation | Box Plot Low | Box Plot High | KM Percentile Low | KM Percentile High |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Other Labs | 0.04 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 %ile | 99 %ile |
Source of Ranges | Low Boundary | High Boundary | Low Boundary %age | High Boundary %age |
---|
Lab | Frequency Seen | Average | Standard Deviation | Sample Count | Lab Samples |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BiomeSightRdp | 3.226 % | 0.001 % | % | 1.0 | 31 |
Thorne | 0.346 % | 0.031 % | % | 1.0 | 289 |
|
And display level must be raised above public.