| "Phytomonas rubrilineans" Lee et al. 1925| Acidivorax avenae| Acidovorax avenae| Acidovorax avenae (Manns 1909) Willems et al. 1992 emend. Schaad et al. 2008| ATCC 19307 [[Pseudomonas rubrilineans (Lee et al. 1925) Stapp 1928 (Approved Lists 1980)]]| ATCC 19860| CCUG 15838| CFBP 2425| CIP 106500| DSM 7227| ICMP 3183| JCM 20985| LMG 2117| LMG:2117| NCPPB 1011| Phytomonas rubrilineans| Pseudomonas avenae| Pseudomonas avenae Manns 1909 (Approved Lists 1980)| Pseudomonas rubrilineans| Pseudomonas rubrilineans (Lee et al. 1925) Stapp 1928 (Approved Lists 1980)| Xanthomonas rubrilineans| Xanthomonas rubrilineans (Lee et al. 1925) Starr and Burkholder 1942
Infective endocarditis: Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus is one of the leading causes of infective endocarditis, particularly in individuals with underlying heart conditions or predisposing factors such as damaged heart valves.
Colorectal cancer: There is evidence to suggest an association between Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus infection and colorectal cancer. Individuals with colorectal cancer have been found to have higher rates of colonization with this bacterium compared to healthy individuals.
Bacteremia: Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus can also cause bacteremia, which is the presence of bacteria in the bloodstream. Bacteremia caused by this bacterium is often associated with underlying gastrointestinal conditions, such as inflammatory bowel disease or colorectal cancer.
Gastrointestinal infections: In rare cases, Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus may cause gastrointestinal infections, including diarrhea and abdominal pain, particularly in individuals with compromised immune systems.
A lot more information is available when you are logged in and raise the display level
Other Sources for more information:
![]() |
NCBI | Data Punk | End Products Produced |
Different labs use different software to read the sample. See this post for more details.
One lab may say you have none, another may say you have a lot! - This may be solely due to the software they are using to estimate.
We deem lab specific values using values from the KM method for each specific lab to be the most reliable.
Lab | Frequency | UD-Low | UD-High | KM Low | KM High | Lab Low | Lab High | Mean | Median | Standard Deviation | Box Plot Low | Box Plot High | KM Percentile Low | KM Percentile High |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Other Labs | 0.13 | 10 | 100 | 0 | 142 | 40 | 10 | 52 | 10 | 100 | 20 %ile | 60 %ile | ||
thorne | 41.38 | 1 | 18 | 0 | 17 | 5.8 | 4 | 5.5 | 1 | 18 | 7.1 %ile | 85.7 %ile |
Source of Ranges | Low Boundary | High Boundary | Low Boundary %age | High Boundary %age |
---|---|---|---|---|
PrecisionBiome | 1.8491953596821986E-05 | 8.916862134356052E-05 | 0 | 0 |
Lab | Frequency Seen | Average | Standard Deviation | Sample Count | Lab Samples |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
es-xenogene | 9.375 % | 0.004 % | 0.005 % | 3.0 | 32 |
Thorne | 25.606 % | 0 % | 0.001 % | 74.0 | 289 |
|
And display level must be raised above public.