Rhodospirillum Details: NCBI 1081, gram-negative or unknown [genus]

| Rhodospirillum| Rhodospirillum Molisch 1907 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Imhoff et al. 1998| Rhodospirillum Molisch 1907 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Lakshmi et al. 2014

1. Non-Pathogenic: Rhodospirillum bacteria are not typically pathogenic to humans. They are part of the natural microbial diversity in various environments, including soil and aquatic ecosystems.

2. Photosynthetic Properties: Rhodospirillum bacteria are capable of anoxygenic photosynthesis, meaning they can use light energy to produce cellular energy without generating oxygen as a byproduct. They contain pigments, such as bacteriochlorophylls, which enable them to harvest light energy.

3. Biotechnological Applications: The unique metabolic capabilities of Rhodospirillum bacteria make them interesting for certain biotechnological applications. They have been studied for their potential use in wastewater treatment, biohydrogen production, and other environmental and energy-related processes.

4. Research Interest: Rhodospirillum and other purple non-sulfur bacteria are subjects of research in fields such as microbiology, environmental science, and bioenergy. Understanding their metabolic processes and interactions with the environment has implications for various scientific and technological applications.

Visuals of Interactions with other bacteria of the same rank

A lot more information is available when you are logged in and raise the display level

Other Sources for more information:

• Immune Epitope Database
• The NCBI taxonomy database
• UniProt
• Immune Epitope Taxonomy Database (IEDB)
• AI Engines For more Details: Perplexity  Kagi Labs  You 

More Information

Statistics

NCBI

Data Punk

End Products Produced

Lab Reporting

Different labs use different software to read the sample. See this post for more details.
One lab may say you have none, another may say you have a lot! - This may be solely due to the software they are using to estimate.
We deem lab specific values using values from the KM method for each specific lab to be the most reliable.

Desired Levels Suggestions for Rhodospirillum

• Frequency - how often do samples show this bacteria
• UD - An alternative statistical algorithm (which factors in the frequency)
• Kaltoft-Moldrup Heuristic Using uploaded data
• Lab Low and High are calculated using the formula that most labs use: Mean - 2 Standard Deviation to Mean + 2 Standard Deviation

These are values that are computed from lab specific samples (Patent Pending)

Lab	Frequency	UD-Low	UD-High	KM Low	KM High	Lab Low	Lab High	Mean	Median	Standard Deviation	Box Plot Low	Box Plot High	KM Percentile Low	KM Percentile High
Other Labs	1.24			1	13600	0	8558	1882.5	126	3406	0	3407	0 %ile	100 %ile
biomesight	44.13	0	30	10	6670	0	4294	834.4	110	1765	0	1390	0 %ile	97.9 %ile
thorne	68.97			1	17	0	18	7.3	6	5.4	1	19	0 %ile	100 %ile
thryve	0.18			14	580	0	1081	297	297	400.2	14	580	25 %ile	50 %ile

External Reference Ranges for Rhodospirillum

Rhodospirillum (NCBI 1081) per million

Source of Ranges	Low Boundary	High Boundary	Low Boundary %age	High Boundary %age
PrecisionBiome	2.173921893700026E-05	5.552501170313917E-05	0	0
Thorne (20/80%ile)	3.12	9.45	0.0003	0.0009

Statistic by Lab Source for Rhodospirillum

These desired values are reported from the lab reports

Lab	Frequency Seen	Average	Standard Deviation	Sample Count	Lab Samples
BiomeSight	49.592 %	0.084 %	0.193 %	2308.0	4654
BiomeSightRdp	41.935 %	0.109 %	0.161 %	13.0	31
CerbaLab	66.667 %	0 %	0 %	2.0	3
custom	2.632 %	0.177 %	0 %	2.0	76
es-xenogene	12.5 %	0.006 %	0.004 %	4.0	32
Medivere	75 %	0.007 %	0.004 %	6.0	8
Microba	17.857 %	0.772 %	0.451 %	5.0	28
SequentiaBiotech	5.714 %	0.014 %	0.001 %	2.0	35
Thorne	51.557 %	0 %	0 %	149.0	289
Thryve	0.194 %	0.021 %	0.032 %	3.0	1543

To see medical conditions associated you may be logged in

And display level must be raised above public.

I would like to know what can change the quality that I have

• If I want to know that a substance also changes, then I just click on it
• If I want to know which study this information comes from, then I just clink in increases or decreases

Data Contradictions — Limits of Certainity

To get the list of studies, you must be logged in and raise your display level.

🧙? Search Hints:

General Substance	Specific Substance	Effect
Antibiotics, Antivirals etc	azithromycin,[CFS]	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Decreases📓, Click for details.
Flavonoids, Polyphenols etc	Humulus lupulus compound {Xanthohumol}	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Decreases📓, Click for details.
Food (excluding seasonings)	Humulus lupulus {Hops}	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Decreases📓, Click for details.
Food (excluding seasonings)	Hydrastis canadensis {Goldenseal}	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Decreases📓, Click for details.
Herb or Spice	5,6-dihydro-9,10-dimethoxybenzo[g]-1,3-benzodioxolo[5,6-a]quinolizinium {Berberine}	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Decreases📓, Click for details.
Prebiotics and similar	xylooligosaccharide	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Probiotics	bacillus	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Probiotics	Bacillus amyloliquefaciens group {B. Amyloliquefaciens}	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.
Probiotics	bacillus,lactobacillus,streptococcus,saccharomyces probiotic	1 Studies recorded. The consensus is Increases📓, Click for details.