For the possible significance see Oral bacteria relative abundance in faeces increases due to gut microbiota depletion and is linked with patient outcomes, 2024
| "Micrococcus prevotii" Foubert and Douglas 1948| Anaerococcus prevotii| Anaerococcus prevotii (Foubert and Douglas 1948) Ezaki et al. 2001| ATCC 9321| CCUG 41932| CIP 105881| DSM 20548| JCM 6508| Micrococcus prevotii| NCTC 11806| Peptococcus prevotii| Peptococcus prevotii (Foubert and Douglas 1948) Douglas 1957 (Approved Lists 1980)| Peptostreptococcus prevotii| Peptostreptococcus prevotii (Foubert and Douglas 1948) Ezaki et al. 1983
Skin Irritation: Handling frogs or coming into contact with their skin secretions may cause skin irritation or allergic reactions in some individuals. This can manifest as redness, itching, or rash. It's essential to wash hands thoroughly after handling frogs or their habitats.
Pathogen Transmission: Amphibians, including Alytidae frogs, can harbor various pathogens, including bacteria (e.g., Salmonella), fungi (e.g., Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis), and parasites (e.g., nematodes). While transmission to humans is relatively rare, it's essential to practice good hygiene when handling amphibians to minimize the risk of infection.
Salmonella: Like many amphibians, Alytidae frogs can carry Salmonella bacteria. Salmonella infection (salmonellosis) in humans can cause symptoms such as diarrhea, abdominal cramps, fever, nausea, and vomiting. These symptoms can range from mild to severe, particularly in young children, the elderly, or individuals with weakened immune systems.
Precautions: To minimize the risk of health issues associated with handling Alytidae frogs or other amphibians:
A lot more information is available when you are logged in and raise the display level
Other Sources for more information:
![]() |
NCBI | Data Punk | End Products Produced |
Different labs use different software to read the sample. See this post for more details.
One lab may say you have none, another may say you have a lot! - This may be solely due to the software they are using to estimate.
We deem lab specific values using values from the KM method for each specific lab to be the most reliable.
Lab | Frequency | UD-Low | UD-High | KM Low | KM High | Lab Low | Lab High | Mean | Median | Standard Deviation | Box Plot Low | Box Plot High | KM Percentile Low | KM Percentile High |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Other Labs | 0.49 | 4 | 13045 | 0 | 9036 | 1432.1 | 40 | 3879.4 | 4 | 13045 | 7.7 %ile | 84.6 %ile | ||
biomesight | 7.88 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 8860 | 0 | 2429 | 305.4 | 40 | 1083.6 | 0 | 180 | 0 %ile | 100 %ile |
thorne | 100 | 3 | 13782 | 0 | 5914 | 831.4 | 59 | 2592.9 | 0 | 581 | 0 %ile | 100 %ile | ||
thryve | 10.92 | 0 | 7 | 10995 | 0 | 3108 | 410 | 60 | 1376.4 | 0 | 372 | 0 %ile | 100 %ile | |
ubiome | 2.92 | 19 | 1377 | 0 | 808 | 186.5 | 74 | 316.9 | 0 | 262 | 0 %ile | 100 %ile |
Source of Ranges | Low Boundary | High Boundary | Low Boundary %age | High Boundary %age |
---|---|---|---|---|
PrecisionBiome | 1.3587730791186914E-05 | 0.00019963877275586128 | 0 | 0 |
Thorne (20/80%ile) | 1.38 | 4.47 | 0.0001 | 0.0004 |
Lab | Frequency Seen | Average | Standard Deviation | Sample Count | Lab Samples |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BiomeSight | 6.039 % | 0.024 % | 0.09 % | 281.0 | 4653 |
BiomeSightRdp | 3.226 % | 0.004 % | % | 1.0 | 31 |
CerbaLab | 66.667 % | 0.001 % | 0 % | 2.0 | 3 |
custom | 1.316 % | 0 % | % | 1.0 | 76 |
es-xenogene | 12.5 % | 0.008 % | 0.009 % | 4.0 | 32 |
Microba | 10.714 % | 0.125 % | 0.031 % | 3.0 | 28 |
SequentiaBiotech | 2.857 % | 1.304 % | % | 1.0 | 35 |
Thorne | 90.657 % | 0.029 % | 0.118 % | 262.0 | 289 |
Thryve | 10.045 % | 0.041 % | 0.149 % | 155.0 | 1543 |
Tiny | 25 % | 0.006 % | 0 % | 3.0 | 12 |
uBiome | 2.868 % | 0.019 % | 0.032 % | 23.0 | 802 |
|
And display level must be raised above public.