| ATCC 6462| Bacillus mycoides| Bacillus mycoides Flugge 1886 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Liu et al. 2018| Bacillus sp. B38V| Bacillus sp. CHR3P1B1| Bacillus sp. JP44SK50| Bacillus sp. JP44SK9| Bacillus sp. TAN 119| Bacillus weihenstephanensis| Bacillus weihenstephanensis Lechner et al. 1998| CCUG 26678| CIP 103472| CIP 105772 [[Bacillus weihenstephanensis]]| DSM 11821 [[Bacillus weihenstephanensis]]| DSM 2048| HAMBI 1827| LMG 18989 [[Bacillus weihenstephanensis]]| LMG 7128| LMG:18989 [[Bacillus weihenstephanensis]]| LMG:7128| NBRC 101228| NBRC 101238 [[Bacillus weihenstephanensis]]| NCTC 12974| NRRL B-14799| NRRL B-14811| NRRL B-23307 [[Bacillus weihenstephanensis]]| NRRL NRS-273| WSBC 10204 [[Bacillus weihenstephanensis]]
Environmental Role: Flavobacterium aquatile and other members of the genus Flavobacterium are known for their diverse metabolic capabilities and their ability to degrade complex organic compounds in aquatic environments. They contribute to nutrient cycling, organic matter decomposition, and the maintenance of ecosystem balance in freshwater and marine habitats.
Biotechnological Applications: Some Flavobacterium species, including Flavobacterium aquatile, have been studied for their potential biotechnological applications, particularly in the fields of wastewater treatment, bioremediation, and aquaculture. They may have roles in the degradation of pollutants and the production of enzymes or bioactive compounds with industrial or environmental significance.
Rare Human Infections: While Flavobacterium aquatile is not considered a common human pathogen, there have been rare reports of infections in humans, typically associated with immunocompromised individuals or those with underlying medical conditions. In such cases, Flavobacterium aquatile infections may present as opportunistic infections, such as wound infections, bacteremia, or urinary tract infections.
Prevention: Preventive measures to minimize the risk of infections with Flavobacterium aquatile or other environmental bacteria include maintaining good hygiene practices, avoiding exposure to contaminated water sources, and implementing proper wound care and infection control measures, particularly in healthcare settings.
A lot more information is available when you are logged in and raise the display level
Other Sources for more information:
 Statistics
|
NCBI | Data Punk | End Products Produced |
Different labs use different software to read the sample. See this post for more details.
One lab may say you have none, another may say you have a lot! - This may be solely due to the software they are using to estimate.
We deem lab specific values using values from the KM method for each specific lab to be the most reliable.
| Lab | Frequency | UD-Low | UD-High | KM Low | KM High | Lab Low | Lab High | Mean | Median | Standard Deviation | Box Plot Low | Box Plot High | KM Percentile Low | KM Percentile High |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other Labs | 0.26 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 27 | 12.8 | 13 | 7.3 | 1 | 20 | 12.5 %ile | 75 %ile | ||
| thorne | 34.48 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 3.6 | 4 | 2.5 | 1 | 9 | 8.3 %ile | 83.3 %ile |
| Source of Ranges | Low Boundary | High Boundary | Low Boundary %age | High Boundary %age |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thorne (20/80%ile) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| XenoGene | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0.01 |
| PrecisionBiome | 1.3938620213593822E-05 | 7.51064217183739E-05 | 0 | 0 |
| Lab | Frequency Seen | Average | Standard Deviation | Sample Count | Lab Samples |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CerbaLab | 66.667 % | 0.002 % | 0 % | 2.0 | 3 |
| es-xenogene | 21.875 % | 0.001 % | 0.001 % | 7.0 | 32 |
| Thorne | 32.27 % | 0 % | 0 % | 91.0 | 282 |
|
|
And display level must be raised above public.
